Should you consider it—and if so, where do you start The Problem As I write this America ranks ~39th in musculoskeletal outcomes, yet we out-spend the next 25 countries combined.¹ Imagine the Yankees finishing dead-last every year despite the biggest payroll in baseball—that’s our current injury-care model. Most of the cost is front-loaded into injections or surgery because insurance makes them feel “free.” Unfortunately, the data show they rarely deliver superior long-term results, and they often leave patients chasing opioids or repeat procedures.² I have struggled to teach patients and practitioners about when regenerative therapy should be incorporated into their care. Sometimes its obvious you have a torn tendon or muscle that isn’t surgical so it just makes sense to use regenerative therapy to heal it faster and deeper. Other times it isn’t as clear. I find myself talking and teaching about the differences in regenerative treatments a lot so I hope this answers a lot of these questions. A Better Way: The Regenerative Ladder™ Think of tissue-healing as a four-rung ladder. You can step off at any level, but the higher you climb, the more powerful (and expensive) the tools become. Key Idea: The higher you climb, the more skill, data, and cost are involved—but starting lower earlier prevents many trips to the top rung. The area that I focus on the most are 2 and 3. I think this is where we find the most “bang for our buck” in terms of outcomes, time and money. I have seen multiple patients do better in level 3 because of our understanding of stacking therapies than in level 4 where we must take the hands-off approach for a while. That’s not to say that regenerative medicine isn’t going to be more powerful in certain cases. It is more to highlight that regenerative biologics can be incredibly powerful and much more affordable. A question I get a lot is what research does any of this have? Proof in the Peptides (Level 3 Highlights) GHK-Cu — The Collagen Architect A tripeptide naturally found in human plasma, GHK-Cu turns on hundreds of genes involved in repair:
BPC-157 — The Tendon Foreman Derived from gastric juice, BPC-157 up-regulates growth-hormone receptors in tendon fibroblasts by up to 7-fold, making those cells hyper-responsive to your own GH pulses.⁶
Stack Smarter: We often layer laser + PEMF (improves micro-perfusion) → BPC-157/ GHK-Cu (directs cellular work) → Kaatsu (GH surge without joint stress). Patients report 40-70 % faster pain-free strength return versus exercise alone. Should we Start Regenerative Early? If a partial-thickness rotator-cuff tear simply “rests” for 6 weeks, the body fills the gap with disorganized scar. Three months later the cuff is weaker, stiffer, and more likely to tear again. By scheduling Level 2-3 aids in the first 2 weeks, we give the body the building blocks and blueprints it needs to lay down near-normal collagen—often visible on ultrasound by week 6. How We Personalize a Regenerative Treatment Plan
Take the Next Step We’re hosting a Regenerative Healing Workshop where you’ll:
Click Register or call [555-123-HEAL] to reserve your seat and start your personalized regenerative roadmap. References (abridged)
(Full reference list available on request.)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorDerrick Hines, D.P.T. is the owner of Acadiana Pain and Performance Rehab. The information in this blog is personal opinion and not to be used as medical advice. Archives
June 2025
Categories |
325 Oil Center Dr. Lafayette, LA 70503
[email protected] |